We rely on your tax-deductible donations to support our mission. Donate online →
Most Policy Initiative logo
Browse Research TOPICS

Local Campaign Contribution Limits

Categorized under
Download pdf
Written by Dr. Isabel Warner, Dr. Chris Wielga
Published on October 28, 2025
Research Highlights

Campaign donations impact electoral and policy outcomes.

Some states and cities have placed dollar limits on municipal campaign donations while others adjust limits with inflation

The effect of contribution limits is unclear: some cities experienced less favoritism in municipal contracts, while others saw little to no policy change.

Local campaign donations correlate with electoral victory and policy outcomes.

Campaign donations are used to support candidates whose positions align with the donor or as an attempt to influence a candidate’s position on an issue (Gaudette & Benedicts-Kessner 2024). Most state and municipal campaign finance laws regulate contributions based on the type of donor: individuals, state parties, political action committees, corporations, and unions (National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) 2023).

In municipal elections, campaign donations correlate with electoral victory, but do not guarantee success (Adams 2018). In a study of 61 small- to mid-size cities, approximately 42% of candidates running at large and 30% running in an individual district won despite being outspent by other candidates.

In local government, campaign contributions are correlated with policy outcomes. For example, a study of 132 cities in five states showed that for every $500 donated by a real estate development interest group, cities permitted an extra 2.5 units of multi-family housing (Gaudette & Benedicts-Kessner 2024).

States and municipalities can limit campaign contributions and provide public financing.

Some states limit the amount that a type of donor can contribute to municipal campaigns (NCSL 2023). Fifteen states (AR, AZ, IN, KY, LA, MA, MS, NC, NH, OH, OK, RI, TN, WV, WY) have placed some form of campaign contribution limits on some donors, while seven states (CA, CT, IL, MD, NV, NJ, and NM) have limits on all contributions regardless of the donor type. NC and VT have dynamic campaign contribution limits, that adjust for inflation each cycle (17 V.S.A. §2905, N.C.G.S. § 163-278.13(b)).

Individual cities have passed ordinances limiting campaign contributions, and limits do not correlate with city characteristics, such as population size or city budget (Table 1).

Springfield, MO (population 170,000, budget $529 million) has also considered campaign contribution limits (City of Springfield 2025a, Springfield Regional Economic Partnership 2022, City of Springfield 2020). Most recently, a proposal would cap contributions to $2,600 per candidate for all donors (City of Springfield 2025b).

Cities and counties such as New York City (population 8.5 million, budget $114 billion) and Montgomery County, Mayryland (population 1 million) have instituted public financing for campaigns in addition to contribution limits (New York City Council 2025, New York City Department of City Planning 2025, Montgomery County Council 2024, Census Reporter 2023, New York City §3-705). In these cases, public money is available to match funds raised by the candidate. However, research suggests this has not reduced expenditures, increased competition, or resulted in higher voter turnout, although it has increased the number of “small dollar” donors (those who give less than $250) (Malbin et al. 2012, Kraus 2006).

Since 2015, Seattle has distributed four $25 vouchers to each registered voter, which can be donated to candidates (City of Seattle § 2.04.620). These result in more overall donations and more small dollar (less than $200) donations from a larger pool of donors (Griffith & Noonen 2022).

The effect of campaign contribution limits is unclear.

There is limited research focusing on the effects of municipal campaign contribution limits in the United States. Research in other countries is mixed. In Colombia, where mayors have significant control over municipal contracts, cities with higher campaign contribution limits saw more contracts awarded to donors (Gulzar et al. 2022). Additionally, those contracts were more likely to go over budget and be behind schedule. In Brazilian cities, municipal campaign contribution limits increased the number of candidates running against incumbents, but did not change policy outcomes in municipal education or health programs in the two years following the election (Avis et al. 2022, Avis et al. 2017).

 

Table 1. Comparison of cities with campaign contribution limits. Examples of cities with contribution limits and their population, median income, and annual budget data for fiscal year 2026. Campaign contribution limits are per single donor source. San Luis Obispo was selected as an example, but more Californian cities with contribution limits can be found at the California Fair Political Practices Commission. Population and median annual income data from U.S. Census Bureau Reporter, and annual budget data from City of San Antonio 2025, Kansas City Office of Management and Budget 2025, City of St. Louis 2025, City of Springfield 2025, Lakewood 2023, and San Luis Obispo 2025.

City Population (2023) Annual Budget Contribution Limits
San Antonio, TX 1.5 million $4 billion $1,000 for may, $500 for all other offices
(Sec. 2-302)
Kansas City, MO 511,000 $2.5 billion $3,325 for mayor, $2,775 for councilperson at-large, $1,657 per in-district councilperson
(Sec. 2-53)
St. Louis, MO 282,000 $1.5 billion $2,600 for all offices
(3.72.030)
Springfield, MO 170,000 $529 million Proposed $2,600 for all offices
(City of Springfield 2025b)
Lakewood, CO 156,000 $257 million $800 for mayor, $400 for all other offices
(2.54.030)
San Luis Obispo, CA 48,000 $218 million $250 for all offices
(2.40.040)

References

10 ILCS 5/9-8.5 Limitations on campaign contributions. Illinois. Link.

15 CSR 30-14.010 - Campaign Contribution Limits. https://www.sos.mo.gov/CMSImages/AdRules/csr/current/15csr/15c30-14.pdf

17 V.S.A. §2905 Campaign Finance, General Provisions, Adjustments for inflation. https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/17/061/02905

2.04.620 Democracy voucher issuance. Seattle, WA. Link

2.40.040 Contribution Limits. San Luis Obispo, CA. https://sanluisobispo.municipal.codes/Code/2.40.040

2.54.030 Candidates; Committees; Registration; Contribution Limits: Expenditures; Reporting. Lakewood, CO. Link

3.72.030 Campaign contribution limitation amounts. St. Louis, MO. Link

A.C.A. § 7-6-203 Contributions - Limitations - Acceptance or solicitation - Use as personal income - Disposition. Arkansas. Link.

Adams B (2018) Campaigning in Lilliput: Money’s Influence in Small and Mid-Sized City Elections California Journal of Politics and Policy, 10(2): 1-17. https://escholarship.org/content/qt4c98922s/qt4c98922s.pdf

ARS 16-192 Individual contribution limits; requirements. Arizona. https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00912.htm

Avis E, Ferrza C, Finan F, Varjao C (2022) Money and Politics: The Effects of Campaign Spending Limits on Political Entry and Competition. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 14(4) 167-199. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27181354

Avis E, Ferraz C, Finan F, Varjao C (2017) Money and Politics: The Effects of Campaign Spending Limits on Political Competition and Incumbency Advantage. NBER. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23508/w23508.pdf

Barber M (2016) Ideological Donors, Contribution Limits, and the Polarization of American Legislatures. The Journal of Politics, 78(1): 296-310. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/683453

California Fair Political Practices Commission (n.d.) Local Campaign Ordinances. https://www.fppc.ca.gov/learn/campaign-rules/local-campaign-ordinances.html

California Government Code § 85300-85321 Contribution Limitations. Link.

Census Reporter (2023) Kansas City, MO. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US2938000-kansas-city-mo/

Census Reporter (2023) San Antonio, TX. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/05000US24031-montgomery-county-md/

Census Reporter (2023) Springfield, MO. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US2970000-springfield-mo/

Census Reporter (2023) St. Louis, MO. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US2965000-st-louis-mo/

Census Reporter (2023) Lakewood, CO. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US0843000-lakewood-co/

Census Reporter (2023) Montgomery County, MD. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/05000US24031-montgomery-county-md/

Census Reporter (2023) San Luis Obispo, CA. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US0668154-san-luis-obispo-ca/

City of San Antonio (2025) FY 2026 Adopted Operating and Capital Budget. https://www.sa.gov/files/assets/main/v/7/omb/documents/fy2026/adopted-budget.pdf

City of San Luis Obispo (2025) Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget in Brief. https://www.slocity.org/government/department-directory/finance/city-budget

City of Springfield (2025a) Consolidated Summary Revenues and Expenditures - All Funds. FY 2025-26 Annual Operating Budget. Link

City of Springfield (2025b) Council Bill 2025- https://springfieldmo.portal.civicclerk.com/event/8670/files/attachment/14499

City of Springfield (2020) City Council Meeting Minutes– November 16, 2020. https://springfieldmo.portal.civicclerk.com/event/3939/files/agenda/2021

City of St. Louis (2025) FY2026 Annual Operating Plan - Executive Summary and Overview. Link

Fleischmann A, Stein L (1998) Campaign Contributions in Local Elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(3): 673-689. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3088044

Gaudette J, Benedictis-Kessner J (2024) Local Money: Evaluating the Effects of Municipal Campaign Contributions on Housing Policy Outcomes. Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/programs/growthpolicy/local-money-evaluating-effects-municipal-campaign-contributions

Griffith A, Noonen T (2022) The effects of public campaign funding: evidence from Seattle’s Democracy Voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 211. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047272722000780

Gulzar S, Rueda M, Ruiz N (2022) Do Campaign Contribution Limits Curb the Influence of Money in Politics? American Journal of Political Science, 66(4): 932-946. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12596

IC 3-9-2 Chapter 2. Campaign Contributions. Indiana. https://iga.in.gov/laws/2025/ic/titles/3#3-9-2

Kalla J, Broockman, D (2016) Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4): 545-558. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajps.12180

Kanas City Code of Ordinances Sec. 2-53. Link

Kansas City Office of Management and Budget (2025) FY2025-2026 Adopted Budget. https://www.kcmo.gov/city-hall/departments/finance/office-of-management-and-budget-omb

KY Rev. Stat. Ann. § 121.025 Corporate contributions to candidates prohibited. https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/statute.aspx?id=46629

Malbin MJ, Brusoe PW, Glavin B (2012) Small Donors, Big Democracy: New York City’s Matching Funds as a Model for the Nation and State. Election Law Journal. 11(1). http://www.cfinst.org/pdf/state/nyc-as-a-model_elj_as-published_march2012.pdf

Maryland Article - Election Law §13-226, §13-227 https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Laws/StatuteText?article=gel&section=13-226&enactments=true

Massachusetts Chapter 55 § 6 Restrictions on expenditures; penalties. https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVIII/Chapter55/Section6

Miss. Code Ann. § 97-13-15 Limitations on corporate contributions to political party or candidate. Link.

Missouri Constitution Art. VIII § 23 (2025) https://www.sos.mo.gov/CMSImages/Publications/MissouriConstitution.pdf

Missouri Ethics Commission (2022) Constitutional Amendment 3 – Contribution Limits and Lobbyist Gift Restrictions. https://www.mec.mo.gov/WebDocs/PDF/Misc/Amendment%203%2012-29-2022.pdf

Missouri Ethics Commission (2025) Advisory Opinion 2017.02.CF.001. https://mec.mo.gov/FAQ/Questions/24

Montgomery County Council (2024) Public Campaign Financing - Amendments. https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/bonds/resources/files/Bill_20-24.pdf

National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) (2023) State Limits on Contributions to Candidates, 2023-2024 Election Cycle. https://documents.ncsl.org/wwwncsl/Elections/Contribution-Limits-to-Candidates-2023-2024.pdf

N.C.G.S. § 163-278.13. Limitation on contributions. https://www.ncleg.gov/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_163/GS_163-278.13.html

Nevada Constitution Sec. 10 Limitation on contributions to campaign. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/const/nvconst.html#Art2Sec10

New Jersey 19:44A-11.3 Contributions, candidates, limitations. Link

New Mexico § 1-19-34.7 Contribution limitations; candidates; political committees. Link.

New York City §3-705 Optional public financing. New York. https://www.nyccfb.info/law/act/optional-public-financing/

New York City Council (2025) New York City Council’s Response to the Fiscal 2025 Preliminary Budget and Fiscal 2025 Preliminary Mayor’s Management Report. https://council.nyc.gov/budget/wp-content/uploads/sites/54/2025/04/Fiscal-2026-Preliminary-Budget-Response-8.pdf

New York City Department of City Planning: Population Division. New York City’s Population Estimates and Trends. Link

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann § 664:4 Contributions https://gc.nh.gov/rsa/html/lxiii/664/664-mrg.htm

Ohio Revised Code § 3517.102 Dollar limits on campaign contributions. Link.

Oklahoma §21-187.1 Individual contributions - Contributions using intermediary or conduit - Lobbyist or lobbyist principal contributions. http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/OK_Statutes/CompleteTitles/os21.pdf

Rhode Island § 17-25-10.1 Political contributions - Limitations. https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/Statutes/TITLE17/17-25/17-25-10.1.htm

RS 18:1505.2 Contributions; expenditures; certain prohibitions and limtations. Louisiana. https://legis.la.gov/legis/Law.aspx?d=81466

Ryan P (2003) Beyond BCRA: Cutting-Edge Campaign Finance Reform at the Local Government Level. National Civic Review, 92(1): 3-18. https://services.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=297237

Sec. 2-53 Limitation on contributions for mayor and council elections. Kansas City, MO. Link

Sec. 2-302 Limitation of political contributions to candidates or officeholders for mayor or council and specific-purpose political action committees. San Antonio, TX. Link

Sec. 9-611 Limits on contributions made by individuals to candidate committees, exploratory committees. When contributions by personal check or credit card required. Contributions by individuals less than eighteen years of age. Connecticut. https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_155.htm#sec_9-611

Sec. 9-613 Business entities. Connecticut. https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_155.htm#sec_9-613

Sec. 9-615 Limits on contributions made by political committees established by organizations. Connecticut. https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_155.htm#sec_9-615

Sec. 9-617 Contributions made or received by party committees. Connecticut. https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_155.htm#sec_9-617

Springfield Regional Economic Partnership (2022) Data: Population. https://www.springfieldregion.com/data/population/

St. Louis Code of Ordinances 3.72.030 Link

Tenn. Code Ann. § 2-10-306 Contribution limits for political campaign committees controlled by political parties or caucuses. Link.

West Virginia Code §3-8-5c Contribution limitations. https://code.wvlegislature.gov/3-8-5C/

Wyo. Stat. § 22-25-102 Contribution of funds or election assistant restricted; limitation on contributions; right to communicate; civil penalty. Link

Most Policy Initiative logo
Contact
238 E High St., 3rd Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
314-827-4549
info@mostpolicyinitiative.org
Organization
© 2026 MOST Policy Initiative | Website design and development by Pixel Jam Digital
Privacy Policy
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram