We rely on your tax-deductible donations to support our mission. Donate online →
Most Policy Initiative logo
Browse Research TOPICS

Phonics Use in Schools

Written by Dr. Jennifer Bean
Published on December 9, 2025
Research Highlights

Fourth grade reading scores remained consistent for 20 years then declined since 2019.

State reading laws include teacher training, guidelines for curriculum, screening students for reading problems, and rules for holding students back.

Since 2025, MO requires SoR-based teacher development, state approved curricula, screening for reading difficulties, and grade promotion rules.

Despite policy changes, reading scores have not changed over 20 years.

Science of Reading (SoR) is an evidence-based approach to reading instruction that emphasizes foundational skills like phonics (Sayag & Gendill 2024). Studies show the clear, step-by-step instruction of SoR increases word recognition and reading comprehension (Duke & Cartwright 2021). In contrast, Balanced Literacy, the other widely used reading approach, uses the three-cueing method. This method encourages students to guess words based on what the word looks like, other words in the sentence, or accompanying pictures (Olson 2023). For more information, see the Phonics and Reading Proficiency Science Note.

Reading First was a 2002 federal education program based on the SoR approach enacted by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. The program increased reading instruction consistency, but did increase national reading comprehension scores (National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2024b, Gamse 2008). In 2015, the NCLB law was repealed and replaced by the Every Student Succeeds Act which gave states more control over reading instruction while in line with the SoR principles. However, reading comprehension scores remained unchanged from 2002 to 2019 both nationally and in MO (NAEP 2024a).

In 2022, fourth-grade reading scores declined nationally and in MO compared to 2019 (Griffin 2025, NAEP 2024a, NAEP 2024b). This is attributed to disruptions in education during the COVID-19 pandemic, including remote and hybrid learning, less time for lessons, and higher rates of students missing school (Griffin 2025, Harris 2025). Students who were already below reading proficiency had a larger decrease in scores, widening the achievement gap between high and low performing students (Griffin 2025, NAEP 2024).

States use four types of policies to improve reading comprehension.

In response to this trend, 40 bills focused on SoR-based instruction were filed in 31 states in 2023 (Gendill 2024, Sayag & Gendill 2024). Twenty-one states enacted these bills by the end of 2024. These bills focused on four main policies (Gendill 2024, Sayag & Gendill 2024, Olson 2023, Table 1):

  • Teacher Preparation and Professional Development (PD). Requires mandatory PD for current K-3 teachers and ensures teacher training programs use SoR practices.
  • Instructional Materials and Curriculum. Regulates what is taught in the classroom, often requiring schools to use state-approved curricula aligned with the SoR.
  • Early Screening and Intervention. Mandates that all students are screened for reading difficulties and compels schools to provide prompt, targeted intervention.
  • Accountability and Promotion Policies. Sets rules for expected reading goals and holds students back if they do not them.

MS's 2013 law was one of the first to combine all four categories into a single, comprehensive legislative package. Since then, twelve other states have adopted this four-part approach (AL, AR, FL, IN, MO, NC, OH, SC, TN, TX, VT, WV). Other states have focused on different structures. For example, GA, HI, ME, and RI created a state-level council or oversight plan to manage their reading success. MA currently leaves the task of addressing reading comprehension to its Board of Education. Similarly, NY delegates all policy development to its education department.

Table 1: State adoption of Science of Reading (SoR) policies. The four main policy areas states use to address decreased reading comprehension scores. States are listed under Required if their law mandates a policy’s implementation. States are listed under Recommended if their law provides funding for or encourages the policy without requiring it.

Policy Area States
Teacher Preparation and Professional Development Required: AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MD, MO, MN, MS, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, OH, OR, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
Recommended: AK, MI, NM, OK, PA
SoR Based Instructional Materials and Curriculum Required: AL, AK, AR, AZ, CT, FL, IA, ID, IN, KY, LA, MD, MO, MD, MS, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, OH, OK, OF, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
Recommended: KS, MI, PA
Early Screening and Intervention for Reading Difficulties Required: AL, AK, AR, AZ, CO, CT, FL, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, LA, MD, MI, MO, MN, MS, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, OH, OK, OR, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
Recommended: DE, NM, PA
Accountability for Reading Success and Promotion to Next Grade Required: AL, AR, FL, IN, MI, MS, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, TX, VT, WV
Recommended: MD, NE

MO has enacted all four reading comprehension improvement policies.

MO requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to select and fund a SoR-aligned PD curriculum for teachers (RSMo 170.014). Along with 22 other states, DESE chose the Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS) as the sole provider of state-funded PD programs (DESE 2022).  LETRS is a SoR-based professional development course that teaches foundational literacy skills (Schwartz 2022). MO mandates university-level teacher preparation programs align their curriculum with the SoR ( RSMo 167.346). School districts must select instructional materials from a list approved by DESE that only contains SoR-based curricula. MO requires school districts to use an approved reading test for students in kindergarten through third grade to screen for reading difficulties and provide prompt, high-quality, evidence-based intervention for at-risk students (RSMo 161.241). Beginning with the 2026-27 school year, a MO student must be retained in the third grade if they do not meet expected reading goals (RSMo 170.014).

References:

Act 451, Michigan Complied Laws § 380.1280f (2024). URL Link

Alabama Literacy Act, Code of Alabama § 16-6G-1 to § 16-6G-8 (2019) URL Link

Alaska Statutes § 14.30.760 to 14.30.775 (2025) URL Link

Annotated Code of Maryland §4-136 (2021) URL Link

Board of Education (2010) 102-1: K-12 Literacy. URL Link

California Codes § 44283 (2021) URL Link.

Code of Virginia § 22.1-253.13 (2022) URL Link

Colorado READ Act § 22-7-1201 (2025) URL Link

Duke NK, Cartwright KB (2021) The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1): S25-S44. URL Link

Early Literacy Intervention Act, Montana Code Annotated § 20-7-1803 (2023). URL Link

Education Code, Texas Constitution and Statutes § 28.0061, 28.021 (2019) URL Link

Excellent Public School Act of 2021, North Carolina General Statutes § 115C-83.3 (2021). URL Link

General Statutes of Connecticut § 10-14u (2021) URL Link

H.4423, 193rd assembly, regular session. (MA 2023-2024. URL Link

Harris S (2025) The Nation’s Report Card Shows Declines in Reading, Some Progress in 4th Grade Math: U.S. Students Not Back to Pre-Pandemic Achievement. National Assessment Governing Board. URL Link

Every Child Can Read Act, Kansas Statutes Annotated § 73-3262 (2023) URL Link

Every Student Succeeds Act Pub. L. No. 114–95, 129 Stat. 1802 (2015) URL Link

Gamse BC, Jacob RT, Horst M, Boulay B, Unlu F. (2008). Reading First Impact Study Final Report (NCEE 2009-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. URL Link

Gendill L (2024) Evidence-Based Instruction Shines in meeting on Early Learning. National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL). URL Link

General Laws of Massachusetts § 69.1D (2024). URL Link

Griffin K (2025) US Students Lose Ground in National Math and Reading Exam. National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL). URL Link

Idaho Statutes § 33-18 (2023) URL Link

Illinois General Assembly § 103-0402 (2023) URL Link

Indiana Code § 20-26-12-24.5 (2023) URL Link

Instructional Materials Law, Current New Mexico Statutes Annotated § 22-25-1 (2023). URL Link

Iowa Code § 17A.7 (2025) URL Link

Kentucky Revised Statutes § 158.791 (2022) URL Link

Laws of Delaware § 2023-108 (2023) URL Link

Laws of Florida § 1280 (2021) URL Link

LD 1526, 131st Maine Legislature. (2023). URL Link

Louisiana Revised Statutes § 17:24.9 (2022) URL Link

Miss. Code Ann. § 37-179-1 (2013) URL Link

Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) (2022) LETRS Science of Reading Professional Development Learning Opportunity. URL Link

Move On When Reading Act, Arizona Revised Statutes § 15-211, 15.501.01 and 15.701 (2022) URL Link

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1992, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2019, 2022, 2024) Missouri Reading Assessments. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. URL Link

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (2024) Reading Assessment (Grades 4 and 8). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. URL Link

National Reading Panel (2000) Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Development. URL Link

Nebraska Reading Improvement Act, LB1081 § 20 (2018). URL Link

Nevada Revised Statutes § 385A.670 (2019). URL Link

New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated § 189:53 (2024). URL Link

New Jersey Legislative Statutes § 18A:6-142 through 150 (2024) URL Link

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002). URL Link

North Dakota Century Code § 15.1-21 (2023). URL Link

Official Code of Georgia Annotated § 20-1-44 (2023) URL Link

Ohio Administrative Code § 3303-33-01 (2022) URL Link

Oklahoma Statutes § 1210.508 (2023). URL Link

Olson L (2023) The Reading Revolution: How States Are Scaling Literacy Reform. Future Ed. URL Link

Oregon Revised Statutes § 0534 (2023) URL Link

Read Act, Minnesota Revised Statutes § 124D.151 (2021). URL Link

Revised Code of Washington § 28A.300.570 (2023) URL Link

Revised MO Statues § 161.241 (2022) URL Link

Revised MO Statues § 167.645 (2023) URL Link

Revised MO Statutes § 170.014 (2025) URL Link

R.I. Gen. Laws § 16-11.4 (2019) URL Link

Right to Read Act, Arkansas Code Annotated § 6-17-429 (2021) URL Link

Sayag EK, Gendill L (2024) Legislatures Lead the Way with “Science of Reading” Approach. National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL). URL Link

Schwartz S (2022) What is LETRS? Why one training is dominating ‘Science of Reading’ efforts. Education Week. URL Link

Shanahan T, Callison K, Carriere C, Duke NK, Pearson PD, et al. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide (NCEE 2010-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. URL Link

South Carolina Code of Laws § 59-155-110 (2024) URL Link

Standards and Instruction (2025) Literacy Initiative. New York State Education Department. URL Link

Statutes of Pennsylvania § 1501-N (2024) URL Link

Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-1-901 (2021) URL Link

Third Grade Success Act, West Virginia Code §18-2E-10 (2023) URL Link

Utah Code Ann. § 53E-3-10 (2022) URL Link

Vermont Statutes Annotated 16 V.S.A. § 2907 (2024). URL Link

Wisconsin Statutes and Annotations § 118.01 (2024) URL Link

Wyoming Statutes § 21-3-401(2019) URL Link

Most Policy Initiative logo
Contact
238 E High St., 3rd Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
314-827-4549
info@mostpolicyinitiative.org
Organization
© 2026 MOST Policy Initiative | Website design and development by Pixel Jam Digital
Privacy Policy
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram