We rely on your tax-deductible donations to support our mission. Donate online →
Most Policy Initiative logo
Browse Research TOPICS

School Discipline and Corrections

Written by Dr. Zachary J. Miller
Published on January 3, 2023
Research Highlights

Some disciplinary policies meant to improve safety in schools are linked to poorer academic performance and early student involvement in the criminal justice system.

Rates of suspension, expulsion and school-related law enforcement encounters are disproportionately higher for boys, students with disabilities, and Black students.

State policies related to school discipline can be targeted to decrease student incarceration rates and improve learning outcomes.

Some disciplinary actions in school systems are associated with students entering the criminal justice system.

On-campus law enforcement officials (e.g., school resource officers) and ‘zero tolerance’ policies for minor infractions of codes of conduct are the primary mechanisms connect-ing students to corrections systems (Mallett, 2016). This pathway is often called the ‘school-to-prison-pipeline' (Mallett, 2016).

School resource officers (SROs) are “sworn law enforcement officers responsible for safety in schools” that can make arrests, respond to calls, and document campus incidents (USDOJ).

  • Few studies have shown SROs to be associated with increases in actual and/or perceived school safety (Javdani, 2019).
    • U.S. data from 2014–18 suggest that SROs did not prevent school shootings (Sorenson, 2021).
  • Schools with SROs tend to report more crimes to law enforcement (Na, 2011).
    • In NC, SRO presence increased suspensions and expulsions by about 70% and the number of referrals to law enforcement by 132% (Sorenson, 2021).

Zero tolerance’ (ZT) refers to a strict disciplinary approach that removes students from school to curb violence and drug use on campus. It can also be applied to minor offenses such as truancy and class disruption (Monahan, 2014).

  • ZT policies prevent administrators from considering the motive and context of situations in disciplinary decisions and can lead to the suspension or expulsion of first-time offenders (Mallet, 2016).
  • In grades 6-8, violation of rules, refusal to follow instructions, disorderly conduct, and repeated classroom disruption accounted for 45% of suspensions; fighting, verbal abuse, profanity, and assault accounted for 25% of suspensions (Wilkerson, 2022).

Security measures such as security cameras, metal detectors, and regular or random searches along with bias based on ability, sex, gender identity, and race also affect the number of students sent into the corrections system (Mallett, 2016; Sorenson, 2021).

School discipline disproportionately impacts minorities, boys, and disabled students, and has negative effects on learning.

Suspensions and arrests are used disproportion-ately for Black students (USDOE, 2014). Hispanic, Pacific Islander, American Indian/ Alaska Native, multiracial students, and students with disabilities also have higher suspension rates than White students (USDOE, 2014; de Brey, 2019).

  • SROs are more common in schools with large minority populations and poorer students (NCWA, 2016).
  • Schools with SROs have higher student arrest rates, especially for Black students and boys (Homer, 2019).
  • In MO, predominantly minority schools have suspension rates 5x more than majority White schools (PRiME, 2020; Figure 1).

Students who have been suspended are more likely to dropout, fail classes and standardized tests (Chu, 2018). While suspended, students are twice as likely to be arrested (Monahan, 2014). High numbers of suspensions/expulsions are associated with increased risk of recidivism to juvenile detention (Novak, 2022).

  • 2/3 of students who never received a suspension graduate in four years compared to only 1/3 of students who have received a suspension (Chu, 2018).
  • Suspended students pass 60% of their classes while non-suspended students passed 80% of their classes (Chu, 2018).
  • Entering the criminal justice system as a student is associated with many negative life outcomes, such as continued involvement with the criminal justice system and lower employment rates (Bernburg, 2006).

Figure 1. In Missouri, average out-of-school suspension (OSS) rates are higher for predominantly minority schools (adapted from PRiME, 2020).

States advance alternative policies to decrease incarceration rates of students and improve learning outcomes.

Policies promoting positive social and professional support, and trust between students and staff may improve learning outcomes (Mallett 2016). Many states have recently advanced policies to reduce the use of corrections in schools, but evaluation of program efficacy is still lacking for many.

  • ND, UT and TN have decriminalized minor status offenses, instead referring children to noncriminal justice services.
    • ZT reform of minor offenses in PA did not reduce long-term suspension rates.
  • CA prohibits suspension of elementary students. VA requires schools to provide suspended students with access to resources so they don't fall behind.
  • KS requires SRO training to minimize the risk of students facing corrections.
  • Several states (NJ, MA, KY, WV, VA) have laws that require implicit bias and equity training for school staff (NCSL 2020).
  • Some states employ more counselors and/or behavior intervention specialists rather than law enforcement to deal with disciplinary issues in schools (NCSL 2020).

References 

Bernburg, J. G., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Labeling, life chances, and adult crime: The direct and indirect effects of official intervention in adolescence on crime in early adulthood. Criminology, 41(4), 1287-1318. 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01020.x

Chu, E. M., & Ready, D. D. (2018). Exclusion and urban public high schools: Short-and long-term consequences of school suspensions. American Journal of Education, 124(4), 479-509.  

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/698454?journalCode=aje

Homer, E. M., & Fisher, B. W. (2020). Police in schools and student arrest rates across the United States: Examining differences by race, ethnicity, and gender. Journal of school violence, 19(2), 192-204.  

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15388220.2019.1604377?src=recsys&journalCode=wjsv20

Javdani, S. (2019). Policing education: An empirical review of the challenges and impact of the work of school police officers. American journal of community psychology, 63(3-4), 253-269. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6597313/

Mallett, C. A. (2016). The school-to-prison pipeline: A critical review of the punitive paradigm shift. Child and adolescent social work journal, 33(1), 15-24. 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10560-015-0397-1

Monahan, K. C., VanDerhei, S., Bechtold, J., & Cauffman, E. (2014). From the school yard to the squad car: School discipline, truancy, and arrest. Journal of youth and adolescence, 43(7), 1110-1122. 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10964-014-0103-1

Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 619-650. 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07418825.2011.615754?scroll=top&needAccess=true&journalCode=rjqy20

Novak, A., & Fagan, A. (2022). Expanding research on the school-to-prison pipeline: Examining the relationships between suspension, expulsion, and recidivism among justice-involved youth. Crime & Delinquency, 68(1), 3-27. 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0011128721999334

PRiME Center (2020). School Discipline Disparities in Missouri’s Public Schools. Saint Louis University PRiME Center, Vol. 2. Issue 10. 

https://bit.ly/3XpjG21

Sorensen, L. C., Acosta, M. A., Engberg, J., & Bushway, S. (2021). The Thin Blue Line in Schools: New Evidence on School-Based Policing across the US EdWorkingPaper No. 21-476. Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. 

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED616763

U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (2014). Civil Rights Data Collection: Data Snapshot of School Discipline, March 21, 2014. 

https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/crdc-discipline-snapshot.pdf

U.S. Department of Justice (2022). Supporting safe schools. Community Oriented Policing Services. https://cops.usdoj.gov/supportingsafterschools. Accessed in November 2022. 

https://cops.usdoj.gov/supportingsafeschools

Wilkerson, K. L., & Afacan, K. (2022). Repeated school suspensions: Who receives them, what reasons are given, and how students fare. Education and Urban Society, 54(3), 249-267. 

https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/GetUrlReputation

Most Policy Initiative logo
Contact
238 E High St., 3rd Floor
Jefferson City, MO 65101
314-827-4549
info@mostpolicyinitiative.org
Newsletter
Newsletter
© 2024 MOST Policy Initiative | Website design and development by Pixel Jam Digital
Privacy Policy
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram