More than half of U.S. states (including IN, IL, IO, and KS) have property tax incentives for solar panels.
Direct cash incentives (e.g., rebates and grants) are associated with the largest increase in residential solar installations.
Property tax incentives are relatively ineffective at increasing new solar project development.
More than half of U.S. states (including IN, IL, IO, and KS) have property tax incentives for solar panels (NCSL 2018). These incentives lower property taxes by either entirely (IN, IO, KS) or partially (IL) mitigating the increase in assessed value because of a solar panel installation.
Some state property tax incentives vary based on project size.
Real property in Missouri, which includes the land itself, growing crops, buildings, structures, improvements, and fixtures on the land, is taxed differently according to its use (STC n.d.).
Assessment. Residential property is assessed at 19% of market value, agricultural land is assessed at 12%, and commercial property is assessed at 32% (STC 2019). Property taxes on real property are then determined based on the assessed value.
Exemptions. In 2013, solar energy systems that are not planned to be resold were excluded from property tax evaluations in MO (RsMO 137.100 (10)).
Direct cash incentives (e.g., rebates and grants) are associated with the largest increase in residential solar installations (Matisoff 2017; Sarzynski 2012).
Property tax incentives are relatively ineffective at increasing new solar project development (Matisoff 2017; Sarzynski 2012). More research is needed to understand the impact of property tax incentives on the construction of utility scale solar projects.